~~ Facebook and Google Promise Congress They’ll Brainwash You With Their Own ‘Counter Propaganda’ ~~

Social media giants have gone a step further and promised Congress that they deploy their own ‘counter-propaganda’ to combat what they consider ‘extremist content.’

⁃ John Vibes

⁃ January 20, 2018

Tech giants Facebook, Google and Twitter testified to Congress this week about extremist content appearing on their platforms. In an odd admission, the companies promised to suppress extremist ideologies online by distributing their own “counter-propaganda.”

Monika Bickert, Facebook’s head of global policy management told Congress on Wednesday that the site plans to take matters into their own hands.

“We believe that a key part of combating extremism is preventing recruitment by disrupting the underlying ideologies that drive people to commit acts of violence. That’s why we support a variety of counterspeech efforts,” Bickert said.

Meanwhile, representatives from Google admitted during the testimony that they use an algorithm to send anti-terror messages to people who they suspect of viewing seditious material. The use of this algorithm is known as the “Redirect Method,” and was developed by a team at Google called the Jigsaw research group Juniper Downs, YouTube’s head of public policy, also said that the company has plans to implement censorship on videos that they deem to be extremist.

“Our advances in machine learning let us now take down nearly 70% of violent extremism content within 8 hours of upload and nearly half of it in 2 hours,” Downs bragged during the testimony.

Meanwhile, Twitter has set up over 100 “training events” all over the world including at elite locations like the White House or United Nations.

witter’s Carlos Monje Jr., director of public policy and philanthropy in the U.S. and Canada, said the company has participated in more than 100 training events since 2015 on countering extremist content.

While countering terrorism is certainly a noble cause, as TFTP has reported at length, these tactics are also used to snub out peaceful views that simply challenge the status quo.

In recent months, social media organizations have come under fire for the negative impact that they have had on human interactions and society at large. These groups have taken the blame for the recent divisions that have been tearing friends and family apart along political lines, and that blame is well placed for the most part.

Much of this problem has been created by the algorithms that curate and select the content that we see online, not the platforms themselves. These problems did not exist when social media had free-flowing timelines that were unrestricted and in chronological order. Unfortunately, these companies do not want to give up the control they have on the content that you consume, so they are doubling down on their algorithms and will undoubtedly make the problems that they seek to solve much worse.

As we also reported this week, YouTube alienated a large portion of its audience this week by demonetizing all of their smaller content creators. In an email sent out to millions of independent artists, musicians, and journalists, YouTube informed them that they were no longer eligible for advertising revenue on the site because their channels were simply not big enough. The site now requires a minimum of 1000 subscribers and 4000 hours of viewed content, automatically disqualifying a large chunk of their creators from monetization.

These companies have become so far removed from their customers that they are no longer concerned with delivering a product that people actually want, which is the inevitable outcome of monopolies.

These organizations may have a stranglehold on the social media market for now, but it is only a matter of time before more free platforms are widely adopted. For example, a blockchain social media website called Steemit has been growing in popularity by the day. On that site, users get paid in cryptocurrency for posting, commenting and even “liking” other posts. You can find The Free Thought Project on Steemit @tftproject.


~~ Morgan and Morgan – Personal Injury Lawyers / Attorneys ~~

📍 https://www.forthepeople.com/

For the people, not the powerful!

When you get hurt, we’re on your side. We battle bullies and insurance companies in court, so that you can focus on getting better. Plus, you pay nothing unless we get you compensation.

Personal Injury Lawyers For The People!

Morgan & Morgan is a leading personal injury law firm dedicated to protecting the people, not the powerful.

We take pride in the fact that we do not represent insurance companies, hospitals or other large corporations. We have limited our law practice to the representation of the people, covering a wide range of personal injury and consumer protection cases.

We can help!

With decades of experience, more than 350 lawyers, and a support staff of nearly 2,000 employees, our firm has helped more than 100,000 clients nationwide. In their efforts to protect the people, not the powerful, our attorneys have established themselves among defense attorneys and insurance providers alike as leading trial lawyers.

We fight for our clients!

We have obtained ground-breaking verdicts in areas such as tobacco litigation and single-day recoveries totaling more than $92 million; however, our success is not measured only by our results.

Our success has garnered news coverage from prominent news outlets, as well as recognition from renowned legal publications. Our attorneys have been designated as “Super Lawyers” and received the esteemed AV Rating, which indicates the highest level of professional excellence.

Featured Attorneys!

Morgan & Morgan has over 350 attorneys, many of them designated as “Super Lawyers” and received the esteemed AV Rating, the highest level of professional excellence obtained only by peer review.

No fee unless we win!

We believe everyone should have access to quality legal representation. That’s why we work on a contingency-fee basis, which means you only pay us if and when we win your case. Our fee is a percentage of the verdict or settlement we obtain for you.

What our clients say!

At Morgan & Morgan, our attorneys are proud of the positive feedback we’ve received over the years regarding the quality of our work and commitment to our clients’ needs. If you are looking for an attorney, hear what our former clients have to say.

Serving Clients Nationwide!

Morgan & Morgan serves clients Nationwide with 40 offices in 11 states including Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, Alabama, Arkansas, Massachusetts, New York & Pennsylvania.

📍 https://www.forthepeople.com/

~~ CDC Gun Research Backfires on Obama ~~

– Kyle Wintersteen

📍August 27th, 2013

In the wake of the Sandy Hook tragedy, President Obama issued a list of Executive Orders. Notably among them, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) was given $10 million to research gun violence.

“Year after year, those who oppose even modest gun-safety measures have threatened to defund scientific or medical research into the causes of gun violence, I will direct the Centers for Disease Control to go ahead and study the best ways to reduce it,” Obama said on Jan. 16.

As a result, a 1996 Congressional ban on research by the CDC “to advocate or promote gun control” was lifted. Finally, anti-gun proponents — and presumably the Obama Administration — thought gun owners and the NRA would be met with irrefutable scientific evidence to support why guns make Americans less safe.

Mainstream media outlets praised the order to lift the ban and lambasted the NRA and Congress for having put it in place.

It was the “Executive Order the NRA Should Fear the Most,” according to The Atlantic.

The CDC ban on gun research “caused lasting damage,” reported ABC News.

Salon said the ban was part of the NRA’s “war on gun science.”

And CBS News lamented that the NRA “stymied” CDC research.

Most mainstream journalists argued the NRA’s opposition to CDC gun research demonstrated its fear of being contradicted by science; few—if any—cited why the NRA may have had legitimate concerns. The culture of the CDC at the time could hardly be described as lacking bias on firearms.

“We need to revolutionize the way we look at guns, like what we did with cigarettes,” Dr. Mark Rosenberg, who oversaw CDC gun research, told The Washington Post in 1994. “Now [smoking] is dirty, deadly and banned.”

Does Rosenberg sound like a man who should be trusted to conduct taxpayer-funded studies on guns?

Rosenberg’s statement coincided with a CDC study by Arthur Kellermann and Donald Reay, who argued guns in the home are 43 times more likely to be used to kill a family member than an intruder. The study had serious flaws; namely, it skewed the ratio by failing to consider defensive uses of firearms in which the intruder wasn’t killed. It has since been refuted by several studies, including one by Florida State University criminologist Gary Kleck, indicating Americans use guns for self-defense 2.5 million times annually. However, the damage had been done—the “43 times” myth is perhaps gun-control advocates’ most commonly cited argument, and a lot of people still believe it to this day.

So, the NRA and Congress took action. But with the ban lifted, what does the CDC’s first major gun research in 17 years reveal? Not exactly what Obama and anti-gun advocates expected. In fact, you might say Obama’s plan backfired.

Here are some key findings from the CDC report, “Priorities for Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence,” released in June:

1. Armed citizens are less likely to be injured by an attacker:

“Studies that directly assessed the effect of actual defensive uses of guns (i.e., incidents in which a gun was ‘used’ by the crime victim in the sense of attacking or threatening an offender) have found consistently lower injury rates among gun-using crime victims compared with victims who used other self-protective strategies.”

2. Defensive uses of guns are common:

“Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million per year…in the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2008.”

3. Mass shootings and accidental firearm deaths account for a small fraction of gun-related deaths, and both are declining:

“The number of public mass shootings of the type that occurred at Sandy Hook Elementary School accounted for a very small fraction of all firearm-related deaths. Since 1983 there have been 78 events in which 4 or more individuals were killed by a single perpetrator in 1 day in the United States, resulting in 547 victims and 476 injured persons.” The report also notes, “Unintentional firearm-related deaths have steadily declined during the past century. The number of unintentional deaths due to firearm-related incidents accounted for less than 1 percent of all unintentional fatalities in 2010.”

4. “Interventions” (i.e, gun control) such as background checks, so-called assault rifle bans and gun-free zones produce “mixed” results:

“Whether gun restrictions reduce firearm-related violence is an unresolved issue.” The report could not conclude whether “passage of right-to-carry laws decrease or increase violence crime.”

5. Gun buyback/turn-in programs are “ineffective” in reducing crime:

“There is empirical evidence that gun turn in programs are ineffective, as noted in the 2005 NRC study Firearms and Violence: A Critical Review. For example, in 2009, an estimated 310 million guns were available to civilians in the United States (Krouse, 2012), but gun buy-back programs typically recover less than 1,000 guns (NRC, 2005). On the local level, buy-backs may increase awareness of firearm violence. However, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, for example, guns recovered in the buy-back were not the same guns as those most often used in homicides and suicides (Kuhn et al., 2002).”

6. Stolen guns and retail/gun show purchases account for very little crime:

“More recent prisoner surveys suggest that stolen guns account for only a small percentage of guns used by convicted criminals. … According to a 1997 survey of inmates, approximately 70 percent of the guns used or possess by criminals at the time of their arrest came from family or friends, drug dealers, street purchases, or the underground market.”

7. The vast majority of gun-related deaths are not homicides, but suicides:

“Between the years 2000-2010 firearm-related suicides significantly outnumbered homicides for all age groups, annually accounting for 61 percent of the more than 335,600 people who died from firearms related violence in the United States.”

Why No One Has Heard This?

Given the CDC’s prior track record on guns, you may be surprised by the extent with which the new research refutes some of the anti-gun movement’s deepest convictions.

What are opponents of the Second Amendment doing about the new data?

Perhaps predictably, they’re ignoring it. President Obama, Michael Bloomberg and the Brady Campaign remain silent. Most suspicious of all, the various media outlets that so eagerly anticipated the CDC research are looking the other way as well. One must wonder how media coverage of the CDC report may have differed, had the research more closely fit an anti-gun narrative.

Even worse, the few mainstream journalists who did report the CDC’s findings chose to cherry-pick from the data. Most, like NBC News, reported exclusively on the finding that gun suicides are up. Largely lost in that discussion is the fact that the overall rate of suicide — regardless of whether a gun is involved or not — is also up.

Others seized upon the CDC’s finding that, “The U.S. rate of firearm-related homicide is higher than that of any other industrialized country: 19.5 times higher than the rates in other high-income countries.” However, as noted by the Las VegasGuardian Express, if figures are excluded from such anti-gun bastions as Illinois, California, New Jersey and Washington, D.C., “The homicide rate in the United States would be in line with any other country.”

The CDC report is overall a blow to the Obama Administration’s unconstitutional agenda. It largely supports the Second Amendment, and contradicts common anti-gun arguments. Unfortunately, mainstream media failed to get the story they were hoping for, and their silence on the matter is a screaming illustration of their underlying agenda.


~~ Scientific Study Reveals Conspiracy Theorists the Most Sane of All ~~

If you’re a conspiracy theorist, then you’re crazy, right? That’s been the common belief for years, but recent studies prove that just the opposite is true.

Researchers — psychologists and social scientists, mostly — in the U.S. and United Kingdom say data indicate that, contrary to those mainstream media stereotypes, “conspiracy theorists” appear to be more sane than people who accept official versions of controversial and contested events.

The most recent study was published in July 2013 by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent in the UK. Entitled “‘What about Building 7?’ A Social Psychological Study of Online Discussion of 9/11 Conspiracy Theories,” the study compared “conspiracist,” or pro-conspiracy theory, and “conventionalist,” or anti-conspiracy, comments on news websites.

The researchers noted that they were surprised to find that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventional ones.

“Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist,” the researchers wrote.

‘The research showed that people who favored the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile’

So, among people who comment on news articles, those who discount official government accounts of events like the 9/11 attacks and the assassination of John F. Kennedy outnumber believers by more than two-to-one. That means the pro-conspiracy commenters are those who are now expressing what is considered conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters represent a small, beleaguered minority that is often scoffed at and shunned.

Perhaps becoming frustrated that their alleged mainstream viewpoints are no longer considered as such by the majority, those who are anti-conspiracy commenters often showed anger and disgust in their posts.

“The research… showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals,” said the study.

Also, it seems that those who do not believe in the conspiracies were not just hostile but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. The researchers said that, according to the anti-conspiracy holders, their own theory of 9/11 — one which says 19 Muslims, none of whom could fly commercial airliners with any proficiency, pulled off an amazing surprise attack under the direction of a man on dialysis (Osama bin Laden) who was living in a cave somewhere in Afghanistan — is unwaveringly true.

Meanwhile, “conspiracists,” on the hand, did not have to pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11. “For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account,” the researchers said.





As reported by Veterans Today:

In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist — a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory — accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

A conspiracy theory about a conspiracy theory

The study also found that conspiracy believers discuss historical context, like viewing the JFK assassination as a precedent for 9/11, more than the antis. It also found that conspiracy believers do not like to be labeled as such.

These and other findings are contained in a new book, Conspiracy Theory in America, by political scientist Lance deHaven-Smith, which was published last year by the University of Texas Press. He explained why people don’t like to be labeled as “conspiracy theorists.”

“The CIA’s campaign to popularize the term ‘conspiracy theory’ and make conspiracy belief a target of ridicule and hostility must be credited, unfortunately, with being one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time,” he said.

He further noted that, essentially, those who use the term as an insult are doing so as the result of a well-documented, undisputed and historically accurate conspiracy by the CIA to cover up the JFK assassination.

Or not.

You be the judge.




“What About Building 7?” A Social Psychological Study of Online Discussion of 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

July 8, 2013

📍Author Information:

Wood MJ, Douglas KM.

School of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Kent Canterbury, UK.


Recent research into the psychology of conspiracy belief has highlighted the importance of belief systems in the acceptance or rejection of conspiracy theories. We examined a large sample of conspiracist (pro-conspiracy-theory) and conventionalist (anti-conspiracy-theory) comments on news websites in order to investigate the relative importance of promoting alternative explanations vs. rejecting conventional explanations for events. In accordance with our hypotheses, we found that conspiracist commenters were more likely to argue against the opposing interpretation and less likely to argue in favor of their own interpretation, while the opposite was true of conventionalist commenters.

However, conspiracist comments were more likely to explicitly put forward an account than conventionalist comments were. In addition, conspiracists were more likely to express mistrust and made more positive and fewer negative references to other conspiracy theories. The data also indicate that conspiracists were largely unwilling to apply the “conspiracy theory” label to their own beliefs and objected when others did so, lending support to the long-held suggestion that conspiracy belief carries a social stigma.

Finally, conventionalist arguments tended to have a more hostile tone. These tendencies in persuasive communication can be understood as a reflection of an underlying conspiracist worldview in which the details of individual conspiracy theories are less important than a generalized rejection of official explanations.”

For more information:






📍The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories:


📍11 Signs Of A False Flag:


📍The Ever-Growing List of ADMITTED False Flag Attacks:


📍10 False Flag Operations That Shaped Our World:


📍42 ADMITTED False Flag Attacks:


📍53 Admitted False Flag Attacks:


📍Recommended Viewing (Medical Documentaries):


~~ Doctors Discuss Manipulative Techniques To Effectively Sell The Idea of Vaccines To Patients ~~

Mmm, #SeemsLegit! OMG, I AM LITERALLY CHOKING ON BIG PHARMA BULLSHIT!!! Deadset, I cannot swallow this much utter shit!!

Have you watched “Communicating Vaccine Science and Advancing Vaccine Impact Expert Panel”?


Lori Buher opens up this fantastic meeting with a vaccine panel at the National Meningitis Association (NMA) with the claim:

“You’ll forgive me if I look down at my paperwork more than I look at all of you…”

And I’m hearing:

“…because, even though I’ve sold out to Big Pharma and I’m ever-conscious of my financial affiliates and personal promoters; occasionally my humanity kicks in and I find it difficult to look people in the eye while knowing that I’m speaking a load of harmful bu115h1t. Also, I prefer to read from notes because I don’t really know WTF I’m talking about…”

Take Dorit Reiss [University of California (UC) Hastings Associate Law Professor], for example. There certainly is no question that there is a conflict of interest when it comes to her, her employer and her vaccine advocacy. Dorit Reiss’s employer is not simply a school of law; it is affiliated to major promoters of the vaccine program and has a strategic role in developing health policy.

According to Wiki:

“UCSF is administered separately from Hastings College of Law, another UC institution located in San Francisco. In recent years, UCSF and UC Hastings have increased their collaboration, including the formation of the UCSF/Hastings Consortium on Law, Science, and Health Policy.”

The Consortium “offers impressive opportunities” for students in education, research, and clinical studies, including internships/externships with Kaiser Permanente and others. (8/28/13 press release). (Paper by Consortium members, “Price Transparency in the Health Care Market).

A November 14, 2013 press release announced a new center for the study of uses for the human genome, a joint endeavor of Kaiser Permanente, UC San Francisco and UC Hastings College of Law. To this end, the National Human Genome Research Institute provided $778,000…

…KP’s quality of care has been highly rated and attributed to a strong emphasis on preventive care, its doctors being salaried rather than paid per service, and an attempt to minimize the time patients spend in high-cost hospitals by carefully planning their stay. However, Kaiser has had disputes with its employees’ unions, repeatedly faced civil and criminal charges for falsification of records and patient dumping, faced action by regulators over the quality of care it provided, especially to patients with mental health issues, and has faced criticism from activists and action from regulators over the size of its cash reserves.”


And let us not forget that Raymond J. Baxter, Kaiser Permanent’s senior VP for community benefit, research, and health policy, is also on the board of the CDC Foundation.

When the Katie Couric show questioned the safety of the HPV vaccine:

📍Katie Couric Slammed For Questioning the HPV Vaccine:


In response to this show, Reiss visited a number of sites spewing Pharma narratives. “Vince Brown” on KatieCouric.com accused Reiss of being “paid to post” in favour of vaccines, to which Reiss replied: “Not really. My law school would pay me the same salary whether or not I post here.”

One of the papers most frequently cited by Reiss in her defence of HPV and the Gardasil vaccine was conducted by Kaiser Permanente on behalf of Merck:

Author Affiliations: Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Oakland (Dr Klein, Messrs Hansen, Emery, and Lewis, and Ms Deosaransingh), Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena (Drs Chao and Jacobsen, Messrs Slezak and Takhar, and Ms Sy), Department of Pediatrics, South Bay Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Ackerson), and Pharmacy Analytical Service, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Downey (Dr Cheetham); and Department of Epidemiology, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey (Drs Velicer and Liaw)….

Financial Disclosure: This study was funded by Merck & Co. Dr Klein receives research support from Merck & Co, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Novartis, and Sanofipasteur for unrelated studies. Dr Jacobsen and Mr Slezak received research funding from Merck & Co for another study related to HPV4. Mr Slezak served as an unpaid consultant to Merck & Co. Dr Chao received research funding from Merck&Co, Amgen, and Pfizer for unrelated studies. Drs Velicer and Liaw are employees of Merck & Co.

Role of the Sponsor: The study sponsor, Merck & Co, provided substantial input into the study design and analytic plan. In collaboration with the Kaiser Study Team, the sponsor reviewed data analyses and helped draft and revise the manuscript. The Kaiser Study Team investigators made final decisions regarding manuscript edits.


Just a few examples of money exchanging hands between “independent” parties. Again, no conflicts of interest here, am I right?!! 😉





No matter, though… Such self-serving, dirty affiliations is unashamedly justified by Reiss herself:

‘Observers of the administrative state warn against “capture” of administrative agencies and lament its disastrous effects. This article suggests that the term “capture”, applied to a close relationship between industry and regulator, is not useful – by stigmatizing that relationship, judging it as problematic from the start, it hides its potential benefits. The literature on “capture” highlights its negative results – lax enforcement of regulation; weak regulations; illicit benefits going to industry. However, this picture is incomplete and in substantial tension with another current strand of literature which encourages collaboration between industry and regulator. The collaboration literature draws on the fact that industry input into the regulatory process has important benefits for the regulatory state. Industry usually has information no one else has, and has more incentive to give that information to a friendly regulator.

Furthermore, working with industry can substantially improve the impact of regulation; voluntary compliance is cheaper and can be more effective than enforced compliance, and industry can help regulators minimize negative unintended consequences. This paper suggests that instead of engaging in name-calling, we should focus on identifying when a close industry-regulator relationship will work in the public interest, and when it is likely to undermine it. That is an empirical question.’

📍The Benefits of Capture:


I advise people to take a look at some of the TRUE, PEER-REVIEWED papers and articles regarding the HPV vaccine Gardasil and Cervarix:

📍Gardasil / Cervarix / HPV Vaccine:


One of my favourite parts of this video may be seen from approximately 14:00…

“What do people think is the best way to quell parental concerns about vaccinations as doctors…?”

This is when the panel members disclose their most successful implementations and techniques when trying to manipulate parents into believing that vaccines are actually safe and effective and that they – these particular kinds of doctors (the pro-vax kind) – actually care about their patients and not their bonuses.

Vaccines, Revenue and Incentives:



📍Governments Are Getting Paid To Inject Your Children:


In writing that, I personally don’t believe all pro-vax doctors are bonus-driven when it comes to encouraging the receipt of vaccinations. I believe many are just well-and-truly indoctrinated by the system and the very little vaccine-related information that they learned throughout their manipulated, intentionally-omissive “education”.

My heart truly goes out to Paul Lee (MD, NYU Winthrop Hospital) @ 19:45 when he goes on to say:

“I think the other dilemma is that for some of these paediatricians is like ‘well, the parents is trusting me on one thing but not trusting me on the other. How can you have a relationship when there is 50% trust…?”

If only this was about your sensitive feelings and self-esteem, Dr. Lee!

Unfortunately for you, some parents have common-sense, they love their children and they don’t just want to be told what to with their baby; not without the right to at least ask for elaboration. Also, there is the chance they are aware of VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System):


📍Medical Intervention. Deaths, Recalls & Legal Advice:


📍FDA Death Calculator:


I’m going to go out on a limb here and add that it may even concern some people that iatrogenic deaths are the third leading cause of death… At least, in the U.S. in 2016 it was…

📍Medical Error – The Third Leading Cause of Death in the U.S.:


“A study by researchers at Johns Hopkins Medicine says medical errors should rank as the third leading cause of death in the United States — and highlights how shortcomings in tracking vital statistics may hinder research and keep the problem out of the public eye.

The authors, led by Johns Hopkins surgeon Dr. Martin Makary, call for changes in death certificates to better tabulate fatal lapses in care. In an open letter, they urge the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to immediately add medical errors to its annual list reporting the top causes of death.


Based on an analysis of prior research, the Johns Hopkins study estimates that more than 250,000 Americans die each year from medical errors. On the CDC’s official list, that would rank just behind heart disease and cancer, which each took about 600,000 lives in 2014, and in front of respiratory disease, which caused about 150,000 deaths.

Medical mistakes that can lead to death range from surgical complications that go unrecognized to mix-ups with the doses or types of medications patients receive.”


📍Study Suggests Medical Errors Now Third Leading Cause of Death in the U.S.:


📍Medical Error – A Leading Cause Of Death:


📍Medical Error:


📍Estimating Hospital Deaths Due to Medical Errors:


📍Errors in Health Care: A Leading Cause of Death and Injury:


📍How Many Die from Medical Mistakes in U.S. Hospitals?:


📍A New Evidence-Based Estimate of Patient Harms Associated With Hospital Care:


📍Medical Error Is A Leading Cause Of Death, But You Won’t See It On The CDC’s List:


📍A New, Evidence-based Estimate of Patient Harms Associated with Hospital Care:


📍Medical Error Action Group:


📍Medical Mistakes: A Silent Epidemic In Australian Hospitals:


Anyway, I could go on forever about the sheer brilliance of every bu115h1t claim in this video; however, I’ll recommend that you just watch it yourself and LEARN THE MANIPULATIVE TECHNIQUES USED BY MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS WHEN ATTEMPTING TO CONVINCE YOU TO INJECT POISON INTO YOUR BABY!

Just FYI, I am not a multi-trillion dollar industry who is reliant upon your belief to maintain multibillions in annual profitable dollars. I earn nothing. In fact, I pay to be able to maintain my right to speak the truth. Just saying…


📢📢 Shoutout to the following articles and their authors! 📢📢



~~ Injecting Aluminum – Professor Chris Exley ~~


‘Devastating study shows high levels of aluminum in the brains of those with autism. Why does this matter? New science shows “Immune Activation Events” during critical periods of brain development leads to autism, and the purpose of aluminium in vaccines is to activate the immune system!’

📍Injecting Aluminum – Clip:

So many of you seem to think that there are so many other ways we are being exposed to aluminium. If that is where you draw the line, it is absolutely evident that you haven’t actually read or looked into Dr. Exley’s findings. That, you’re beyond stupid, or you’re a troll.

He found that microphages (immune responses) are what delivered this particular form of aluminium to the brains of these autistic individuals.

Microphages are immune response cells and he found that they contained the aluminium that was delivered to the brain. We know that the body’s vaccine immune response is different from the immune response we have naturally. It so happens the type of aluminium particles in the brain samples was the same in vaccines and not the same and the majority of aluminium particles we absorb in our daily lives. The aluminium in vaccines have a different ionic make up that make it harder for the body to discard it through elimination organs like the kidneys. So the difference is the aluminium injected into the body is not eliminated similarly to aluminium absorbed alternative ways.

Dr. Exley expresses his concern about vaccines because, in his findings; they are the obvious culprit for the neurological damaging aluminium in the brain samples. He doesn’t mention any other because there is no other evidence in the findings to demonstrate other forms of aluminium being absorbed into the body as being the catalyst for the damage.


‘In no other drug on the planet (except for vaccines) would safety standards ever be determined without using the actual product (aluminum hydroxide) administered in the proper way (intramuscular injection), into the proper patient population (infants).

‘To date, aluminium adjuvants per se have, perhaps surprisingly, not been the subject of any official experimental investigation, and this being in spite of the well-established neurotoxicity of aluminium’.

“Most vaccines contain aluminium, and aluminium is a proven neurotoxin, in amounts received from vaccines. Vaccines in combination can result in toxic aluminium overload. Even the aluminium in a single vaccine can be harmful because the aluminium is in a form that is more dangerous than ingested aluminium. Specifically, vaccine aluminium is in nanoparticulate form, which is harder for the body to eliminate because it is transported around the body differently than ingested aluminium.

It is natural and normal to ingest small doses of aluminium from food and water. It’s not good for you, but the body has adequate defences. Absorption of ingested Al is low, about 0.3%, so about 99.7% is eliminated in faeces. Ingested aluminium is in ionic form (individual charged atoms), which is readily removed by the kidneys. Also, ionic aluminium is blocked from entering the brain by the blood brain barrier. The low absorption, rapid elimination by the kidneys and barrier to brain entry adequately protects the brain from aluminium.

However, nanoparticulate aluminium from vaccines cannot be removed by the kidneys. The particles are far too large to be filtered out by the kidneys. The Al nanoparticles do dissolve slowly (converting to ionic aluminium). But long before they can dissolve completely, the Al nanoparticles are ‘eaten’ by immune system cells called macrophages. In other words, the particles wind up inside the macrophages. Once loaded with the Al nanoparticles, the macrophages spread aluminium as they travel through the body. This is dangerous, because the Al-loaded macrophages carry Al nanoparticles to tissues (e.g. the brain) that are damaged by very small amounts of aluminium.”

– VaccinePapers.org


📍New Study:

Massive Aluminum Levels In Autism Brains, Is This The Smoking Gun For Vaccines?

“These are some of the highest values for aluminium in human brain tissue yet recorded.”

— Professor Chris Exley of Keele University, discussing new findings of Aluminum levels in the brains of people with autism

By J.B. HANDLEY – November 27, 2017

View story at Medium.com


📍Professor Gherardi – Aluminium In Vaccines Ends Up In The Brain:


Did British Scientists Just Solve The Autism Puzzle?

By J.B. HANDLEY – December 8, 2017

Five clear, replicable, and related discoveries explaining how autism is triggered have formed an undeniably clear picture of autism’s causation, and possibly ways to alleviate the symptoms, too. Most of the research that has created this understanding has been published in the last 36 months, and largely from international scientists in the United Kingdom, Canada, France, Israel, and China. The U.S. media? Silent.

View story at Medium.com


📍Aluminium In Brain Tissue In Autism:



📍Aluminium Toxicity:




Leaked Document Reveals Internet Trolls Are Government Agents:



The Art of Deception – Training for a New Generation of Online Covert Operations:



Yes, There Are Paid Government Trolls On Social Media, Blogs, Forums And Websites – ESPECIALLY GREAT LINK!:



Getting Paid to Deny Disrupt Degrade & Deceive:



CIA Agents to Troll Alternative Media Sites in Huge Propaganda Program:



Federal Government Hires Internet TROLLS to Monitor and “Correct” Online Discussions:



Is ‘The Five Eyes Alliance’ Conspiring to Spy on You?

The dire threat of surveillance agencies working together to keep an eye on one another’s citizens:



How Covert Agents Infiltrate The Internet To Manipulate, Deceive and Destroy Reputations:



How To Get Paid To Troll On The Internet!:


Ep 18- Was 12-Year-Old Vaccine Boy a Hoax? [My Incredible Opinion]:


The Vaccine Truth Denialist – ESPECIALLY GREAT LINK!!:



Polioforever’s Blog – The Rockefeller Institute:



2013 MEASLES NEWS: The UK’s Fake Welsh Measles Epidemic – Only 8 Cases Confirmed For March – 302 Wrongly Diagnosed and “Notified” By Docs:



UPDATE MEASLES UK 2013 – BBC News Secretly Removes Fake News Claims from Website – Health Officials in Tail-Spin Over Vastly Hyped Claims of Welsh Measles Epidemic:



Callous Disregard:



Rotavirus Vaccines Still Contaminated With Pig Virus DNA:



Irrefutable Evidence Shows Historical Application of Vaccines Had No Health Benefit or Impact on Prevention of Infectious Disease:



The Silent Order NSA Sees Everything Hears Everything Documentary HD:



Pro-Vax Trolls Are Impersonating Disease-Injured Families On Comment Boards:



David Gorski, M.D. – The Worldwide Wanker of “Woo”:



Exposing Dr. David H. Gorski, M.D., Ph.D. who believes he can use a cloak of anonymity and character assaults to discredit opposing views. Sorry Doc, but your game is up. – ESPECIALLY GREAT LINK!:



Dr. David H. Gorski aka “ORAC” aka “Respectful Insolence”:



EXCLUSIVE: Hijacked By Pro-Vaccine Troll, Dr. David Gorski, Wikipedia Publishes Deceitful Entry On Vaxxed Documentary:



Huffington Post goes all-in for pro-vaccine propaganda, BANISHES veteran writer from website for posting honest review of VAXXED documentary:



HuffPo censors VAXXED documentary article and blocks writer account after discredited science troll David Gorski hijacks Wikipedia to trash the film:



CIA Propaganda and Disinformation:



Declassified Documents Prove CIA Worked Closely With Many Of The Largest Media Outlets:



FB Censorship:



FB’s Employment of Poynter:



Snopes Exposed As Disinformation Operation:



Stop These Murders:



Dr. Paul Offit Exposed As Skeptical Raptor:



Marines Begin Swamp Drain Operation:



Nurse Warns of “Biologics” and Forced Flu Shots Happening in US Hospitals:


Nurse Whistleblower: Hospitals Vaccinating Patients by Force Without Their Knowledge:



The Google Monopoloy:



Illuminati, NWO, War, Banks, Israel, ISIS, Zionism, Satanism:


📍The United Nations Fraud:


📍The History of the Pharma Cartel:

📍All Presidents Are Related By Blood, Including Most World Leaders:

📍Former Ohio Representative, Jim Traficant – “Israel Controls America” (2009):

📍Forced To Sign Loyalty To Israel – Cynthia McKinney (2014):

~~ RIP Colton Berrett – Paralysed and Now Dead Due to the HPV Vaccine ~…

#RIP #ColtonBerrett! 💜

It’s OK, though, don’t worry. This is for the “#GreaterGood”. It doesn’t happen to most people; I’m sure your child will be OK. 😉🤞🏻

Don’t listen to me, though. Pro-vaxxers have certainly put me in my place. I’m just a stupid mother who uses the internet. I am certainly not #DrSinHangLee, MD – the Director at Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory who alleges gross misconduct, malfeasance and what potentially amounts to criminal behavior to mislead the global public regarding the safety of HPV vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix.

Nor am I #DrLeonard exposing the HPV vaccine as #PopulationControl.

And I know I’m not Japan who stopped the distribution of the HPV vaccine to begin a full-scale probe due to safety issue concerns.

I also don’t work at the #AmericanCollegeOfPediatricians, so that wasn’t me who issued the warning about the vaccine causing premature #OvarianFailure.

Nor am I the #Pfizer Vice President claiming the vaccine is a deadly #scam.

I didn’t participate in any biomedical research studies that provide evidence of the #HPVVaccine causing #cancer.

And I am certainly not #BigPharma – the most powerful industry in the world… The industry whose multi-trillions of annual profitable dollars are reliant upon your trust and belief in the “scientific” fecal matter they spoon-feed you.

Anyway… It’s your child. Why should you bother questioning anything? It’s easier just to immediately dismiss as incredible all the evidence and the activists selflessly using their unpaid time, losing their skeptical family and friends, copping endless criticism and ridicule, risking their reputation, gaining child welfare interference due to their “conspiracy theorist” mindset… Even LITERALLY risking, some even losing, their lives… Why? Because it just doesn’t get more fun than that, does it?!

DO NOT LISTEN TO US!! Your child is worth the risk! 😉



Check it 👇🏻👇🏻

📍#Gardasil / #Cervarix / #HPV #Vaccine:




~~ If Not For Cops, Who Else Would Protect Us From Little Girls Picking Daffodils On Mother’s Day?! ~~

📍If Not For Cops, Who Else Would Protect Us From Little Girls Picking Daffodils On Mother’s Day?!:


📍Police Officer Confiscates Daffodils Girls Picked For Mother’s Day:


~~ Facebook Censorship – Deleting Accounts on Behalf of Governments ~~

Today’s date (Sydney, Australia) – Saturday, January 13, 2018


In JUST the last couple of days, I have seen at least 8 of my activist friends just disappear. IF the person is able to revive their account, I realised they were removed from my friend’s list, in addition to their removal from pages and groups for they were admin.



Oh… and Google, Facebook… This is MY website, corrupt, censorship-happy whores! Try to remove it! 🖕🏻

121AA7D2-D16D-4BBE-A7DA-5FAF9538DFC5 Why do I believe they victimised Ben? The screenshots below illustrate the traffic increase he brought to our anti-vaccine / anti-Pharma / anti-NWO / pro-health Anonymous-supporting activist page – within less than 48 hours.


Facebook Says It’s Deleting Accounts For The U.S., Israeli, & German Governments — This Is Just The Beginning January 1, 2018


6FD478B3-254E-4285-A2A6-08833C98FBE5 “Germany is raiding civilian homes over social media posts, France is threatening to ban websites indefinitely, Trump’s White House was just behind a pair of Facebook & Instagram accounts getting deleted, and Israel just threw a woman in jail for recording a confrontation with their military through Facebook’s Live video feature — and this is just the beginning…

F539CB8E-DA57-4990-994B-F90A12EEC25B According to Pulitzer prize winner Glenn Greenwald, the Israeli government — in partnership with Facebook — have begun aggressively targeting Palestinian voices on social media for censorship;

“The meetings — called for and presided over by one of the most extremist and authoritarian Israeli officials, pro-settlement Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked — came after Israel threatened Facebook that its failure to voluntarily comply with Israeli deletion orders would result in the enactment of laws requiring Facebook to do so, upon pain of being severely fined or even blocked in the country… Ever since, Facebook has been on a censorship rampage against Palestinian activists…”

This isn’t much of a surprise though, considering the Times of Israel reported in early January of 2016 that the government’s military censor had been trying to control much of what could and could not be posted on Facebook.

Interestingly (or unsurprisingly), the Intercept claims Israeli calls for Palestinian bloodshed remain largely untouched by way of comparison.

91C9DEAF-7FA2-4572-8598-2B8FB077E027.jpeg Israeli leadership say they’re only targeting social media accounts that inspire “incitement” against their country and people, but critics — including myself — believe this is simply an indirect form of censorship, considering that they have a very well documented history of aggressively targeting and silencing media correspondents.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]

In fact, journalists frequently engage in self censorship to avoid the Israeli government’s reproach. I don’t blame them for this chosen course of action either, since Israeli forces have (successfully) targeted media personnel for assassination in the past, by simply using the excuse that they were affiliated with terrorists. Human Rights Watch has accused the regime of “war crimes” because of this.

They also recently arrested a woman for simply filming a live recording on Facebook, of an incident between her daughter and the military, claiming she was engaging in “incitement“. Israeli officials are quick to go after anything that even vaguely resembles resistance to their illegal occupations and colonization of Palestine.

It should also be mentioned that Israeli authorities passed a law to censor websites engaged in “promoting criminal or terror activity”  — another vague generalization, ambiguous enough to justify shutting down any pro Palestinian website or group that rejects Israeli foreign occupation.

Facebook also recently deleted the Facebook and Instagram accounts of the head of the Chechen Republic Ramzan Kadyrov, simply because the U.S. government decided to place him on a list of people that should be sanctioned.<br<br<br<br<br
t of my limited knowledge this guy is a very bad person, but just because the U.S. government says someone should be sanctioned does not justify censoring them, for the obvious fact that the U.S. government has a long history of deception and corruption — as well as supporting dictators, drug lords and even terrorists — and thus simply cannot be relied upon to be the arbiter of Truth.

Germany’s government has taken even greater repressive steps towards imposing censorship; On January 1st The German Network Enforcement Law (NetzDG) was passed, which allows the authorities to censor any website they claim is involved in the spread of “hate speech,” or “fake news“. Social media outlets that do not obey the government’s demands, to have content removed within 24 hours (7 days for more “complex cases“), will be fined up to to €50 million (roughly $58 million).

According to the Guardian, far right wing deputy leader Beatrix von Storch had her Facebook account suspended as a result of this law, and is currently facing potential criminal prosecution because of her behavior.

The staunch nationalist politician was quoted as accusing the Cologne police department of appeasing “barbaric, gang-raping Muslim hordes of men” when they tweeted an Arabic Happy News Years message (they did the same in French, German, and English). Twitter temporarily banned her account as well for this.

D51A6FBC-5646-4EAE-BC50-29AF6BEAE6C5 Do I agree with her opinion or method of expressing it, no I most certainly do not. But this is a slippery slope that leads to irrational censorship, because emotions and feelings are starting to override logic and reason. When someone insults me online I debate with them, and rebuke them logically and intelligently. If they persist and are clearly irrational trolls I simply block them, just as everyone online can do when they are confronted with an unpleasant human being. It’s really not rocket science.

This censorship started long before this law even came into effect though. According to the New York Times, 36 homes were raided by German police for “hateful postings over social media” last year. And according to a posting made by Facebook’s European Vice President for Public Policy back on June 19, 2017, “In the last two months, we’ve deleted an average of 3,500 posts per week, which were reported as hate speech in Germany. This means we delete around 15,000 posts a month for hate speech in Germany.” A few months after this, “tens of thousands of fake profiles” were allegedly deleted by Facebook during the German election. How many of these were actually fake we most likely will never know, since Facebook’s customer service is shockingly awful and people tend not to pursue these things as a result.

French president Emmanuel Macron has just announced similar proposals to allegedly ban fake news.  Like the German government, they intend to block any website they find fault with. In response to these overreaching intentions, French Twitter users have been spreading the hashtag #InventeDesFakeNews (or InventYourFakeNews).

Facebook’s willingness to compromise on freedom of speech, and their moral integrity, shouldn’t come as much of a surprise either. Back in 2016, several former employees told Gizmodo that they routinely manipulated people’s newsfeeds, and the world’s most popular social media platform was also caught conducting psychological experiments on their users back in 2014. Relevant to this blog in particular, the company has also made headlines on numerous occasions for engaging in censorship.[14][15][16] Likewise, Twitter has also engaged in censorship on a number of occasions, including censoring the hashtags #PodestaEmails and #DNCLeak during the U.S. elections.<br<br<br<br<br
dly been addressed by the establishment media.

THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING Throughout history there has been an information war between the ruling class and the common people. The so called elite know that without us believing in their imaginary authority, they would never be able to rule over us, wage major wars, or turn us into worker ants for their unscrupulous system.

Since the internet’s introduction there has been a change in the world unlike any before. Activists, revolutionaries, and concerned citizens alike, are all now able to communicate in an unprecedented way. You see, the ruling class’s power historically, has firmly been rooted in our ignorance and inability to effectively communicate and organize rebellion. Naturally, as our access to information and social media have accelerated, so too has our ability to intelligently rebel.

The ruling class are well aware of this dangerous unfolding, and although it has taken them rather long to respond to this mass awakening (showing that they underestimate our power in my opinion), they are now taking more assertive steps to control our ability to access important information. Consequently, we can expect this censorship to only get worse, and it will be done under the guise of “preserving democracy,” or some other bullshit excuse that the unwitting and naive will cheer with ignorant fervor.

It should also be mentioned that although I have been highlighting tech giant abuses in this blog, I largely believe that Mark Zuckerberg and other social media bosses have very limited control over what they can and cannot actually do with their own companies, so placing all the blame on them would be wrong. I believe this is due to an antiquated power structure that has been in place for much longer than any of these companies have even been around, as vaguely mentioned by Facebook’s former executive Chamath PaliHapitiya. This system is much bigger than any one man, or one company, and is going to take a collective effort from a significant percentage of the world’s population to overcome.

GOOGLE IS HIRING 10,000 ADDITIONAL HUMAN CENSORSGoogle announced last month that it will be hiring an additional 10,000 human censors to police “problematic content” online. While this will most certainly be done under the auspices of fighting terrorism, hate speech, and the usual stories — and in many instances I presume they will — I know from first hand experience it will also be used as a tool of indirect censorship.

96664B7F-7DCD-427E-9ECE-BC972ACD91EE.jpeg Amongst the many annoyances I have personally dealt with pertaining to online activism, I’ve also had my YouTube account shut down, and banned, with no proper clarification as to why except a broad set of ambiguous community guidelines which I allegedly violated.

Last year Google claimed it would fight “fake news,” but was caught instead censoring legitimate websites like CounterPunch, World Socialist Website, Democracy Now, American Civil liberties Union, and Wikileaks, amongst others. Certainly not the type of behavior one would expect from an organization with the ironic motto, “Do the right thing” (previously “Don’t be evil”).

Furthermore, as I documented in a previous blog, there are numerous verifiable instances of the establishment media spreading lies, inciting war (large scale terrorism), and deceiving the public, yet they aren’t being held to the same standard as smaller alternative media outlets, who are being censored for doing the same thing on a much smaller scale.

This is shamefully biased and wrong, if we are to earnestly purge deception from news media, it should be done indiscriminately and with objective concern for the Truth.

CENSORSHIP OF THE INTERNET IS ULTIMATELY CENSORSHIP OF KNOWLEDGE & TRUTH The internet does not merely represent technological achievement, it mostly represents the knowledge and ideas of millions and millions — and even billions — of people who dedicated their lives before us to fighting for a better world. And although these great thinkers and minds may no longer be with us, their thoughts, ideas, and teachings live on through the internet.

These teachings are then discovered by other people like us, who are lucky enough to have access to something as remarkable as the world wide web. We then learn from them and then expand upon them. We see the world around us, and try to figure out how we can create a better world by applying many of these teachings, and where possible we expand upon them through social media and other available platforms.

Being able to communicate and share our thoughts and ideas freely, is the key to furthering this great mission and progress, because mankind as is; dominated by war, racism, tribalism, elitism, poverty, inequality, injustice, and corruption, has yet to actually reach a state of authentic civilization — It is a great duty which we all share to help realize a decent world.

But when a group of powerful governments and elitist interests — that have ultimately profited from keeping us ignorant throughout history — start telling us that they are going to censor our thoughts, ideas, and regulate our ability to communicate under the cloak of benevolence, it means they are ultimately going to hide important knowledge from us; because all expression online — even the most irrational and idiotic — represent some form of knowledge, even if it is just the knowledge of what the most extreme elements of society are thinking.

6B6D04B2-5DE7-4FC1-A971-3CCDA68730BD.jpeg Why should it be up to the ruling class to decide what knowledge is good, and what is bad? Do not all of us possess the ability to think for ourselves? Do not all have us have the ability to block or ban someone that is acting like a fool online? So how can we rely on the very elitist class that has benefited from our ignorance throughout known history to be in charge of the regulation of knowledge and information?? The answer to that last question is very simple, we cannot, and we would be very stupid to think that we can.

At the end (or beginning depending on your perspective) of our journey towards creating a better world, is the realization that we are actually the ones with the power not them. Their only real power resides in controlling our minds and what we believe. Without this, they literally have nothing. They become insane people running around making ridiculous demands and establishing rules using their imaginary authority — a course of action that would generally land someone in a mental institution, which is exactly where the overwhelming majority of them belong.

We must adjust intelligently to the changing of these times, and raise our standards accordingly my friends. Be precise when sharing information, fact check, and where ever possible, provide overwhelming evidence to prove your point. The censors are looking for reasons to take us down, so we must become more intelligent in our delivery.

Our ignorance has always been their power, but our disillusionment, and subsequent awakening — which is happening right now — will ultimately be their demise. I am not calling for a violent revolution, I am calling for a revolution of the mind.

We are many, and they are few. We just have to wake up and their bullshit game is over.”

Written by Gavin Nascimento, Founder Of aNewKindofHuman.com


~~✖️✖️— RELEVANT LINKS —✖️✖️~~

” ] https://youtu.be/bEw5VhNqPRA

” ] Like established media outlets, bloggers now required to submit all security-related posts for advance review.



at the Direction of the U.S. and Israeli Governments – December 31, 2017


ounts, Raising Policy Questions – December 28, 2017

ar – YouTube Video – July 2, 2017


35 Countries Where the U.S. Has Supported Fascists, Drug Lords and Terrorists – March 4, 2014

Here’s a handy A to Z guide to U.S.-backed international crime.