~~ U.S. Government Colludes With Big Pharma To Poison The American People ~~

There should be absolutely no doubt about it: The outrageous and odious childhood vaccination regimes instituted across the 50 states and territories of the USA are the product of a multi-decade conspiracy on the part of the US Federal Government and its many health-related organs and corporate collaborators.

Just who are those many co-conspirators?

This conspiratorial group of institutions includes the U.S. Public Health Service, the Center for Disease Control, the National Institutes of Health, the American Medical and Psychiatric Associations, the American Hospital Association, the Pharmaceutical Industry, the Medical Profession, the Health Insurance Industry, the World Health Organization, and the United Nations.

When operating in concert to administer the many vaccination programs throughout the nation, these institutions represent a monolithic bulwark known as the Global Vaccination Complex.

Continue Reading:

πŸ“Post Link:
http://themillenniumreport.com/2016/06/the-vaccine-conspiracy-u-s-government-colludes-with-big-pharma-to-poison-the-america-people-2/

~~ Polio – Never Eradicated; Simply Redefined ~~

I love it when vaxtards drop an image like this, which is falsely attributed to a lack of vaccination, anyway:

I suppose this is in contrast to the β€œgreat new days”, right? Please note: These first two images feature Colton Berrett, who is now dead due to his vaccine-induced injury.

Besides that, it was never eradicated; simply redefined. You have to be blind to not accept this fact.

~Nic~

βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–

βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–

πŸ“4 Things You Didn’t Know About Vaccines:

https://traditionalcookingschool.com/health-and-nutrition/4-things-you-didnt-know-about-vaccines/

βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–

βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–

πŸ“The Unknown Facts of Polio:

https://www.slideshare.net/safehealer/the-unknown-facts-of-polio

βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–

βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–

πŸ“Cancer Risk Associated With SV40 Contaminated Polio Vaccine:

https://www.facebook.com/719623851517180/posts/1393751200771105/

https://anonymousnotables.com/2018/01/17/cancer-risk-associated-with-simian-virus-40-contaminated-polio-vaccine/

πŸ“Polio / Poliomyelitis Vaccine:

https://www.facebook.com/VforVaccines/posts/1344916508987908

https://anonymousnotables.com/2017/09/03/polio-a-comprehensive-compilation-proving-decades-of-fraud/

πŸ“Bill β€œDepopulation” Gates:

https://www.facebook.com/VforVaccines/videos/1342993942513498/

https://anonymousnotables.com/2018/05/10/bill-depopulation-gates-2/

πŸ“Hiding Polio:

http://www.whale.to/vaccine/polio1.html

~~ The Vitamin K Shot – More Injectable Poison ~~

Aside from synthetic vitamin K, the shots contain polysorbate 80, propylene glycol, sodium acetate anhydrous and glacial acetic acid…

Did you know: polysorbate-80 opens up the blood-brain barrier, allowing aluminium direct access to attack a newborn’s brain? Let’s call it β€œVitamin K”.

Baby’s Life, Day 1 – The beginning of brain damage.

~Nic~

βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–

βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–

One of the very first things on a doctor or midwife’s to-do list after the birth of a baby is a vitamin K shot. The purpose of an injection of vitamin K is to assist the newborn with blood clotting capabilities in order to prevent the very rare problem of bleeding into the brain during the first weeks of life. It is usually given within minutes of birth. The risk of this serious complication is about one in every 10,000 live births.

The vitamin K injection is also a supposed safeguard in case your car is involved in a car wreck on the way home from the hospital or birthing center with newborn in tow. Even a mild injury to a newborn could be life threatening if blood clotting capability is not adequate.

At first blush, allowing the vitamin K shot seems to be a no brainer. Safety of this precious, helpless little being is of paramount importance and questioning the necessity of this shot seems ludicrous. Since questioning the unquestionable is something I seem to have a knack for, let’s have at it. Is the vitamin K shot really of any value?

Let’s start with the vitamin K used in the shot itself. Is it a natural form of vitamin K such as would be found in leafy greens (K1) or butter (K2)? No, it is a synthetic vitamin K – generic name phytonadione. Synthetic vitamins should be avoided as they can cause imbalances in the body and have unintended consequences. For example, synthetic vitamin A actually causes the type of birth defects that natural vitamin A prevents!

How much synthetic vitamin K is in the shot? Shockingly, the national standard mandated by most states for US hospitals to administer is over 100 times the infant’s RDA of this nutrient. Since studies have linked large doses of vitamin K with childhood cancers and leukemia, this large dose of synthetic K administered within minutes of birth seems questionable at best.

The fact is that medical science still does not know that much about the metabolic fate of vitamin K. Little to no unmetabolized vitamin K shows up in urine or bile. This is disturbing given the fact that vitamin K is a fat soluble vitamin and therefore has the potential to accumulate in body tissues. More disturbing is that the liver of a newborn does not begin to function until 3 or 4 days after birth. As a result, this little being has very limited to no ability to detoxify the large dose of synthetic vitamin K and all other the dangerous ingredients in the injection cocktail including:

πŸ“Phenol (carbolic acid – a poisonous substance derived from coal tar)

πŸ“Benzyl alcohol (preservative)

πŸ“Propylene glycol (better known as β€œedible” antifreeze)

πŸ“Acetic acid (astringent, antimicrobial agent)

πŸ“Hydrochloric acid

πŸ“Lecithin

πŸ“Castor oil

The manufacturer’s insert included with the shot includes the following warning:

β€œSevere reactions, including fatalities, have occurred during and immediately after intravenous injection of phytonadione [synthetic Vitamin K] even when precautions have been taken to dilute the vitamin and avoid rapid infusion…”

The manufacturer’s insert is no exaggeration of the risks. On October 17, 2013, a case of anaphylactic shock in a newborn from the synthetic vitamin K shot was reported making the possibility of death from this shot a a very real side effect.

πŸ“Mephyton Patient Information Including Side Effects:

https://www.rxlist.com/mephyton-drug/patient-images-side-effects.htm

Does this make any sense to you? It makes absolutely no sense to me. How could anyone say that this shot is safe and effective for newborns?

❌ Safe Alternatives to the Synthetic Vitamin K Shot:

How about this for an alternative – eat lots of leafy greens in the weeks before your due date (I drank a cup or two of nettle tea every day in the final weeks which is loaded with vitamin K1) to make sure your blood is high in vitamin K and of course, this will transfer to your baby as well. Does vitamin K pass the placenta? It most certainly does as do all the fat soluble vitamins.

πŸ“Vitamin Passage Across The Placenta:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1102224

Another important point is to make sure you breastfeed your child as the probiotics in breastmilk will seed your baby’s digestive tract with the right type of good bacteria which will produce naturally occurring vitamin K immediately after birth.

Skip the shot, eat your greens, and breastfeed. Now, THAT makes some sense.

❌ Experts – Oral Vitamin K a Safer Option Than Injection:

Oral vitamin K is a safe and viable alternative to the synthetic vitamin K shot. Even though oral vitamin K is not as efficiently absorbed as when injected, this is easily compensated for with an adjustment to the dose.

πŸ“Oral Vitamin K (Far) Superior to Vitamin K Shot for Newborns:

https://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/oral-vitamin-k-better-vitamin-k-shot/

According to the Cochrane Collaboration (an international committee of medical doctors of the highest caliber):

β€œVery similar rates of protection against classical and late hemorrhagic disease can be achieved by giving repeated oral doses, either 1 milligram weekly or 25 micrograms daily.”

πŸ“Midwife Informed Consent For Vitamin K – Vitamin K Injection or Oral Administration:

http://www.gentlebirth.org/archives/vitKvgf.html

Undertaking this form of oral prophylaxis requires that parents accept responsibility for ensuring the course is completed.

Vitamin K expert Dr. Cees Vermeer PhD concurs, suggesting that oral vitamin K is a better option for your infant than injection. He also says that even though oral K is the better and safer alternative, mothers who are adequately supplementing themselves with vitamin K and are breastfeeding may not even need to supplement their newborns.

❌ Other Countries Using Oral Vitamin K:

It seems that other countries aren’t such big fans of the vitamin K shot either. In 1992, the Netherlands eliminated the vitamin K shot in favor of administration of 1 mg oral Vitamin K at birth followed by daily doses of 25 mcg from week 1 to 3 months of age in breastfed infants.

πŸ“New Dutch Practice Guidelines For Administration Of Vitamin K To Full-Term Newborns:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672291

The result of this change? No cases of Vitamin K Deficiency Bleeding (VKDB) – even late onset!

In Switzerland, a slightly different oral vitamin K protocol is used, which consists of weekly 1 mg oral doses for 2-3 months.

If your healthcare provider is leading you to believe that there aren’t safe and effective alternatives to the toxic vitamin K shot, time to call them out on their ignorance.

πŸ“Skip That Newborn Vitamin K Shot:

https://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/skip-that-newborn-vitamin-k-shot/

βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–

βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–

❌ Vitamin K Ingredients:

The vitamin K injections administered by hospitals and manufactured by Merck and Roche and Abbott contain benzyl alcohol as a preservative. The 1989 PDR states that, “there is no evidence to suggest that the small amount of benzyl alcohol contained in AquaMEPHYTON (Merck’s vitamin K injection product), when used as recommended, is associated with toxicity.” Interestingly, in November 1988, the French medical journal, Dev Pharmacol Ther, published a paper regarding benzyl alcohol metabolism and elimination in babies. The report stated that “…we cannot directly answer the issue of safety of ‘low doses’ of benzyl alcohol as found in some medications administered to neonates. This study confirms the immaturity of the benzoic acid detoxification process in premature newborns.”

Roche’s vitamin K product KONAKION contains ingredients such as phenol (carbolic acid-a poisonous substance distilled from coal tar), propylene glycol (derived from petroleum and used as an antifreeze and in hydraulic brake fluid) and acetic acid (an astringent antimicrobial agent that may drastically reduce the amount of natural vitamin K that would have otherwise been produced in the digestive tract). As reported in the PDR and as published in the IM vitamin K packet inserts for Merck, Roche and Abbott, “Studies of carcinogenicity, mutagenesis or impairment of fertility have not been conducted with Vitamin K1 Injection (Phytonadione Injection, USP).”

The Vitamin K injection can be in a base of polyethoxylated castor oil.

Vitamin K injections also contain hydrochloric acid and lecithin.

πŸ“Vaccine Package Inserts:

http://www.vaclib.org/chapter/inserts.htm

❌ Effects of Vitamin K Administration:

The manufacturers warn on the product insert:

β€œSevere reactions, including fatalities, have occurred during and immediately after intravenous injection of phytonadione even when precautions have been taken to dilute the vitamin and avoid rapid infusion…”

The Vitamin K shot has been linked to leukaemia, including acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, which is characterized by an increased number of white corpuscles in the blood, and accounts for about 85% of childhood leukaemia.

Research carried out by Dr. Louise Parker, of the Sir James Spence Institute of Child Health in Newcastle upon Tyne, produced the most startling results. Dr. Louise Parker was quoted in the British Medical Journal in 1998 as stating:

β€œIt is not possible, on the basis of currently published evidence, to refute the suggestion that neonatal IM vitamin K administration increases the risk of early childhood leukemia.”

The British Journal of Cancer published:

β€œFactors associated with childhood cancer” by J. Golding, et al, in 1990.

πŸ“https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1971807/

πŸ“https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1971807/pdf/brjcancer00216-0134.pdf

The report indicated that universally administered IM vitamin K injections significantly increase our children’s chances of developing childhood cancer.

A follow-up study published two years later in the British Medical Journal (Golding J, Paterson K, Greenwood R, Mott M. Intramuscular vitamin K and childhood cancer. BMJ 1992; 305:341-346.) reinforced the findings of the previous study.

πŸ“Postnatal Care – Routine Postnatal Care of Women and Their Babies:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK55928/

The authors’ comments, in keeping with scientific style, are conservatively stated, but parents who are concerned about the health of their babies will read “danger” between the following lines:

β€œThe only two studies so far to have examined the relation between childhood cancer and intramuscular vitamin K have shown similar results and the relation is biologically plausible. The prophylactic benefits against haemorrhagic disease are unlikely to exceed the potential adverse effects from intramuscular vitamin K…”

The chance of your child developing leukaemia from the Vitamin K shot is estimated to be about one in 500 (MIDIRS Midwifery Digest, Vol 2 #3, September 1992).

Animal studies have linked large doses of vitamin K to a variety of conditions that include anaemia, liver damage, kidney damage and death.

Interestingly the common problem that occurs these days of jaundice in newborns has only been reported since the introduction of Vitamin K administration.

According to the product insert, adverse reactions include haemolysis (hemolysis) – meaning breakdown of red blood cells – haemolytic anaemia (a disorder characterised by chronic premature destruction of red blood cells); hyperbilirubinemia (too much bilirubin in blood) and jaundice (yellow skin and eyes resulting from hyperbilirubinemia), allergic reactions include face flushing; gastrointestinal upset; rash; redness, pain or swelling at injection site and itching skin.

It also warns that large enough doses can cause brain damage in infants and/or impairment to liver function.

Hypoxia has also been published as having occurred in infants after Vitamin K administration.

❌ For more information:

πŸ“Vitamin K – Is It Really Safe and Necessary:

http://www.vaccination.inoz.com/VitaminK.html

βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–

βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–

πŸ“Newborn Vitamin K Shot:

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/03/27/high-risks-to-your-baby-from-vitamin-k-shot-they-dont-warn-you-about.aspx

❌ Story At-A-Glance:

Administering vitamin K shots to newborns has been a standard medical procedure in most western countries since 1944. However, according to Vitamin K expert Dr. Cees Vermeer PhD, vitamin K offered orally is a better option for your infant than injection.

Vitamin K shots are given to infants to prevent Hemorrhagic Disease of the Newborn (HDN).

Giving newborns a syringe full of vitamin K may cause psychological trauma, give infants 20,000 times more vitamin K dose than what is needed, and create an environment for infections to occur.

There are safer ways to raise vitamin K levels in newborns; giving vitamin K orally is one way. While breastfeeding enables mothers to transfer low doses of vitamin K to their child, this will depend on the mother’s vitamin K levels.

Whether you choose to give your baby the shot or give vitamin K orally, gather all the information needed to make informed decisions.

Internationally renowned natural health physician and Mercola.com founder Dr. Joseph Mercola and Cees Vermeer, PhD discuss medical interventions wherein newborn babies routinely received vitamin k shots.

πŸ“Vitamin K – Dr. Mercola and Cees Vermeer, PhD:

https://youtu.be/BJSrKXynjB4

βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–

βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–

πŸ“Does your Baby Need a Vitamin K Shot?:

https://avn.org.au/information/vaccines-and-diseases/baby-need-vitamin-k-shot/

πŸ“Vitamin K Controversy. What Controversy?:

http://www.vaclib.org/basic/vitamin-k.htm

~~ Dr. Mawson’s Vax vs. Unvaxxed Study Has NOT Been Retracted ~~

When you can’t deny the scientific facts, try fabricating some bullshit. It works wonders for Big Pharma and the pro-vax community. πŸ˜‰

Copying and pasting the text from my friend’s post. Thank you, James.

πŸ˜ŠπŸ™πŸ»β™₯️ ~Nic~

βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–

βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–

‘Why do the PV trolls keep insisting the Mawson vax vs unvax study has been retracted? It isn’t retracted. That is #FakeNews put out by people who fear the truth. It is still right there on their website. Just go to the “Journal of Translational Science” website and search for it. Snopes has been Snoped – once again.

“There was no retraction statement ever made or posted by Frontiers; therefore Retraction Watch’s statement about Dr. Mawson’s paper being retracted is inarguably false. This proven lie was used to interfere with and misconstrue Dr. Mawson’s research, resulting in a temporary removal of his article from The Journal of Translational Science pending an inquiry. Inquiry resolved, the articles have been reinstated on the journal’s website, demonstrating sufficient proof that the articles were never retracted as claimed by Retraction Watch.”

“…Retraction Watch took an activist role in the attempted takedown of Dr. Mawson’s research. Misconstruing and misrepresenting another scientist’s research is considered scientific misconduct. Retraction Watch still has (at the time of writing) an article posted that claims the paper has been doubly retracted. Their actions have a ripple effect, furthering the harm to Dr. Mawson and his younger colleagues, actions which are harmful to reputations, careers, and their future livelihoods.”

Repeat: Misconstruing and misrepresenting another scientist’s research is considered scientific misconduct.”

To the PV trolls with a supposed scientific background, you like to play fast-and-loose with debunking studies by misconstruing the facts. Guilty of scientific misconduct; the lot of you.’

πŸ“Has Snopes Been Snoped? Will Retraction Watch Retract?:

http://info.cmsri.org/blog/has-snopes-been-snoped-will-retraction-watch-retract

ALSO SEE:

πŸ“Snopes.com Exposed As Disinformation Operation:

https://anonymousnotables.com/2018/01/17/snopes-com-exposed-as-disinformation-operation/

βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–

βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–βž–

Dr. Anthony R. Mawson, MA, DrPH (Doctor of Public Health) – The Relevant Study:

πŸ“Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated – Dr. Anthony Mawson’s Homeschooled Study Reveals Who is Sicker:

https://youtu.be/sbFfDQYdjzM

πŸ“Pilot Comparative Study on the Health of Vaccinated and Unvaccinated 6-12-Year-Old U.S. Children:

http://www.oatext.com/Pilot-comparative-study-on-the-health-of-vaccinated-and-unvaccinated-6-to-12-year-old-U-S-children.php

πŸ“Publication History:

βž–Received Date: March 22, 2017

βž–Accepted Date: April 21, 2017

βž–Published Date: April 24, 2017

πŸ“Abstract:

“Vaccinations have prevented millions of infectious illnesses, hospitalizations and deaths among U.S. children, yet the long-term health outcomes of the vaccination schedule remain uncertain. Studies have been recommended by the U.S. Institute of Medicine to address this question. This study aimed 1) to compare vaccinated and unvaccinated children on a broad range of health outcomes, and 2) to determine whether an association found between vaccination and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), if any, remained significant after adjustment for other measured factors. A cross-sectional study of mothers of children educated at home was carried out in collaboration with homeschool organizations in four U.S. states: Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi and Oregon.

Mothers were asked to complete an anonymous online questionnaire on their 6- to 12-year-old biological children with respect to pregnancy-related factors, birth history, vaccinations, physician-diagnosed illnesses, medications used, and health services.

NDD, a derived diagnostic measure, was defined as having one or more of the following three closely-related diagnoses: a learning disability, Attention Deficient Hyperactivity Disorder, and Autism Spectrum Disorder. A convenience sample of 666 children was obtained, of which 261 (39%) were unvaccinated.

The vaccinated were less likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with chickenpox and pertussis, but more likely to have been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis media, allergies and NDD. After adjustment, vaccination, male gender, and preterm birth remained significantly associated with NDD. However, in a final adjusted model with interaction, vaccination but not preterm birth remained associated with NDD, while the interaction of preterm birth and vaccination was associated with a 6.6-fold increased odds of NDD (95% CI: 2.8, 15.5).

In conclusion, vaccinated homeschool children were found to have a higher rate of allergies and NDD than unvaccinated homeschool children. While vaccination remained significantly associated with NDD after controlling for other factors, preterm birth coupled with vaccination was associated with an apparent synergistic increase in the odds of NDD. Further research involving larger, independent samples and stronger research designs is needed to verify and understand these unexpected findings in order to optimize the impact of vaccines on children’s health.”

πŸ“Conclusions:

“Assessment of the long-term effects of the vaccination schedule on morbidity and mortality has been limited [71].

In this pilot study of vaccinated and unvaccinated homeschool children, reduced odds of chickenpox and whooping cough were found among the vaccinated, as expected, but unexpectedly increased odds were found for many other physician-diagnosed conditions.

Although the cross-sectional design of the study limits causal interpretation, the strength and consistency of the findings, the apparent β€œdose-response” relationship between vaccination status and several forms of chronic illness, and the significant association between vaccination and NDDs all support the possibility that some aspect of the current vaccination program could be contributing to risks of childhood morbidity.

Vaccination also remained significantly associated with NDD after controlling for other factors, whereas preterm birth, long considered a major risk factor for NDD, was not associated with NDD after controlling for the interaction between preterm birth and vaccination.

In addition, preterm birth coupled with vaccination was associated with an apparent synergistic increase in the odds of NDD above that of vaccination alone. Nevertheless, the study findings should be interpreted with caution. First, additional research is needed to replicate the findings in studies with larger samples and stronger research designs. Second, subject to replication, potentially detrimental factors associated with the vaccination schedule should be identified and addressed and underlying mechanisms better understood. Such studies are essential in order to optimize the impact of vaccination of children’s health.”

FOR THE ENTIRE STUDY, PLEASE SEE:

πŸ“Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated – Mawson Homeschooled Study Reveals Who is Sicker:

http://info.cmsri.org/the-driven-researcher-blog/vaccinated-vs.-unvaccinated-guess-who-is-sicker

*PLEASE NOTE: I DO NOT AGREE THAT “VACCINATIONS HAVE PREVENTED MILLIONS OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES”, AS CLAIMED IN THE FIRST LINE OF THE ‘ABSTRACT’.

~Nic~

~~ Big Pharma Shopping: Dump-On-The-Go ~~

Ever been mid-haircut at the salon when you suddenly realise you need to take a shit?

Been standing for three-and-a-half hours in line for concert tickets when it suddenly dawns upon you that lunch at Taco Bell may not have been such a great idea?

In an important business meeting, busting for a Number #2; but you’re desperately pressed for time?

Then Big Pharma’s β€œDump-On-The-Go” is just what you need!!

~~ ❌❌ β€” CUSTOMER REVIEWS β€” ❌❌ ~~

β€œTake it from me! I work AND I’m a mum and I just simply don’t have the time to use the bathroom when I’m taking a shit! At Parent-Teacher interviews, Dump-On-The-Go was an absolute life-saver!” πŸ‘πŸ»πŸ’πŸΌ

β€œDuring my daily one-hour commute to uni was the first time I used Dump-On-The-Go. Never again will I shit in between train carriages. Thank you Dump-On-The-Go!” β˜πŸ»πŸ‘¨πŸ»β€πŸ’»

β€œI’m a patisserie chef and two minutes can mean all the difference between smooth whipped cream and undesired butter. Since setting up Dump-On-The-Go in the bakery, overwhipped cream is a thing of the past! I highly recommend it!” πŸ™πŸ»πŸ‘©πŸ»β€πŸ³

Just sit… 🚽 βž– And shit… πŸ’© βž– It’s lit! πŸ”₯😎

(This is satirical ~Nic~)

~~ Anti-Fertility / Sterilisation / Depopulation ~~

πŸ“Pharma Co. Has License Suspended As Vaccine Blamed For The Sterilization Of 500,000 Women & Children (late 2017):

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/pharma-co-vaccine-license-sterilization/

πŸ“Raila Odinga – Government Injecting Women With A Vaccine That Causes Infertility (late 2017):

β€œRaila Odinga, who swore himself in a president of Kenya this week has claimed their tests prove the government’s tetanus vaccine has sterilized hundreds of thousands of women and children.”

Depopulation much?

~~ Conspiracy Theories and False Flags ~~

πŸ“The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories:

https://conspiracypsychology.com/author/disinfoagent/

πŸ“11 Signs Of A False Flag:

http://www.activistpost.com/2013/11/11-signs-of-false-flag.html

πŸ“The Ever-Growing List of ADMITTED False Flag Attacks:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-07/ever-growing-list-admitted-false-flag-attacks

πŸ“10 False Flag Operations That Shaped Our World:

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Terrorism/10_False_Flag_Operations.html

πŸ“42 ADMITTED False Flag Attacks:

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/02/41-admitted-false-flag-attacks.html

πŸ“53 Admitted False Flag Attacks:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/53-admitted-false-flag-attacks/5432931

~~ Sodium Fluoride / Fluorine – The Toxicity of Our Water ~~

You know, even before I donned this obviously-fashionable tin-foil hat I wear these days, fluoride being added to our water was the one thing that I could never justify, nor reason when my brother and I would speak about ‘conspiracy theories’. With other things, I would always be like: “Meh, who knows what the real story is”, etc.

My brother and I would often speak about our dziadzia (grandfather in Polish) and all that he endured as a concentration camp victim and (then a) survivor of WWII. We had an interest in Hitler and Naziism and were aware that under Hitler’s regime fluoride was added to the water supply. In Australia, we were always told that this addition of fluoride to our water and toothpastes was to e.g. strengthen our teeth.

Even in my historical ignorance, I was like:

“Really, though…? Correct me if I’m wrong, but I’m going to go out on a limb and say – I’m not so sure Hitler really gave a $h17 about the teeth of his prisoners… You know what I mean…?” 🧐

See, with fluoride in our water, toothpastes, etc.; I learned enough at school (despite the governmental manipulation of our curriculum) to know that fluoride wasn’t exactly in the nutritional pyramid of healthy eating. In fact, I learned it was extremely poisonous. Hence, why I could never reason with this ‘conspiracy theory’.

Anyway… While there are THOUSANDS more articles, videos, papers, etc. supporting the toxicity of fluoride; I have gathered for you a collection of those I have found to be quite compelling and informative, IMO.

~Nic~

🚰☠️🚰☠️🚰☠️🚰☠️🚰☠️🚰☠️🚰☠️🚰☠️🚰☠️🚰☠️🚰

πŸ“Fluoride Is Poison – Demo:

πŸ“10 Facts About Fluoride:

πŸ“The 12 Biggest Science Lies You’ve Been Told By Corporations, Government and the Corrupt Media:

πŸ“Rockefeller, The Chemical Industry and the FDA:

πŸ“The History of the Pharma Cartel:

https://anonymousnotables.com/2018/02/18/the-origins-of-the-big-pharma-cartel/

πŸ“Printable List of Bottled Water Containing Fluoride:

http://www.realfarmacy.com/printable-list-of-bottled-water-containing-fluoride/

πŸ“America Funded the Nazis:

πŸ“America – Deliberate Poisoning:

πŸ“Fluoride Was First Used In Nazi Germany:

πŸ“HITLER & FLUORIDE – Added High Doses to Water at Concentration Camps Keep People LIKE WALKING DEAD:

πŸ“THE NAZI CONNECTION: Fluoride Is About Control!:

πŸ“The Great Culling – Our Water:

πŸ“Acute Fluoride Toxicity From Toothpaste Ingestion:

http://fluoridealert.org/studies/acute03/

πŸ“The Fluoride Deception:

πŸ“Fluoride Toxicity – Conners Clinic:

http://www.connersclinic.com/fluoride-toxicity/

πŸ“Water Fluoridation Promotes Thyroid Impairment, Study Warns:

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2015/03/10/water-fluoridation-thyroid-dysfunction.aspx

πŸ“Fluoridated Water: The Bone-Destroying Daily Drink Fooling Millions of Americans:

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/08/08/bone-fluorides-magnet-new-studies-halflife.aspx

πŸ“Water Fluoridation Infographic:

http://www.mercola.com/infographics/water-fluoridation.htm

πŸ“An Inconvenient Tooth – Fluoride Documentary:

πŸ“Expert Testimony: How Your Drinking Water May Be Damaging Your Brain:

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2014/07/01/water-supply-fluoridation.aspx

πŸ“Dr. Paul Connett, PhD Speaks to Dallas City Council on June 11, 2014:

πŸ“The Truth About Fluoride with Dr. Paul Connett MR NEWS:

πŸ“Presentation to Peel Region ~ Legal Opinion on Water Fluoridation:

πŸ“US Government Admits Americans Have Been Overdosed on Fluoride:

http://crazzfiles.com/big-surprise-us-government-admits-americans-have-been-overdosed-on-fluoride/

πŸ“Fluoride – Poison on Tap:

πŸ“Neurobehavioural Effects of Developmental Toxicity:

http://www.thelancet.com/journals/laneur/article/PIIS1474-4422(13)70278-3/fulltext

πŸ“Dental Fluorosis is a Reflection of What’s Happening in Our Bones and is the First Visible Sign of Fluoride Poisoning:

http://www.fluoridation.com/teeth.htm

πŸ“Useful Fluoridation-Related Charts & Graphs:

http://ffo-olf.org/usefulFluorideUseCharts.html

πŸ“The Truth About Fluorine/Fluoride:

http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Article/210884-2017-01-16-the-truth-about-fluoride.htm

πŸ“FLUORIDE – Public Murder on a Mass Scale – Dr. Dean Burk, National Cancer Institute Explains:

πŸ“THRIVE: What On Earth Will It Take?!:

πŸ“Stanley Kubrick – Fluoride (1964):

πŸ“Fluoride – Poison on Tap (Documentary & Literature):

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/10/14/fluoride-poison-on-tap-documentary.aspx

πŸ“Fluoride Action Network – Facebook Page:

https://www.facebook.com/FluorideActionNetwork/

πŸ“Dr. Joseph Mercola – Facebook Page:

https://www.facebook.com/doctor.health/

~~ GSK’s 69 Infanrix Deaths Are Not Explicable As Coincidence ~~

Adverse Events Caused by Infanrix hexa Vaccine Results in 69 Deaths

Dr Puliyel analyzed the data and found that 97% of deaths (65 deaths) following Infanrix hexa , occur in the first 10 days and only 3% (2 deaths) occur in the next 10 days. Had the deaths been coincidental SIDS deaths unrelated to vaccination, the numbers of deaths in the two 10 day periods should have been the same.

The manufacturers of this vaccine GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) disclosed in a confidential report to the Regulatory Authority that about 72 babies died within 20 days of receiving Infanrix hexa. They reported that the deaths of these children were due to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and Sudden Unexpected Death Syndrome (SUDS) unrelated vaccination. However an Italian Court of Justice Nicola Di Leo ordered that it be made public and is now available on the internet:

πŸ“πŸ“

http://autismoevaccini.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/vaccin-dc3a9cc3a8s.pdf

Analysis of the data shows that at least 69 out of 72 deaths reported were likely to have been caused by the vaccine.

Infanrix hexa combines vaccines against 6 diseases [namely Diptheria, Tetanus and Acelluar Pertusis (whooping cough), Hepatitis B, inactivated Poliomyelitis and Haemophilus influenza type B] in a single vaccine. The DPT vaccine, Hepatitis B, Hib and injectable Polio have been administered separately in the past. The newer combined vaccine is being promoted on the grounds that it reduces the number of injections given to babies. The safety of the combination is now being questioned.

The manufacturers had reported these sudden and unexpected deaths were not caused by the vaccine but were merely coincidental SIDS deaths. Dr Puliyel analyzed the data and found that 97% of deaths (65 deaths) in the infants below 1 year, occur in the first 10 days and only 3% (2 deaths) occur in the next 10 days. Had the deaths been coincidental SIDS deaths unrelated to vaccination, the numbers of deaths in the two 10 day periods should have been the same.

Dr Puliyel has published his findings on the US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health PubMed Commons. This was being done he writes, β€œto put it up for open review by the scientific community, on account of its urgency, as this is a matter that involves the lives of children and there is a continuing risk to children”.

In some ways this is similar to Pentavalent vaccine combining vaccines against 5 disease ( DPT, Hepatitis B, Hib vaccines) which has caused a large number of deaths in developing countries in Asia. Puliyel notes that these deaths are completely unnecessary as the vaccines could have been given separately, and separately they have a long track record of safety. One hopes that the findings will result in an honest acknowledgement of the harms being done by these combined vaccines.

Recently the CIOMS and WHO altered the way safety of vaccines is evaluated and Puliyel notes that the revised method facilitates misclassification of adverse events following immunization as has happened in this case.

Puliyel also questioned why safety data has to be kept confidential. The GSK report released recently by the Italian Court is dated 16 December 2011. Had it been made public at that time, a large number of unnecessary deaths in 2012, 2013 and 2014 could have been avoided.

For more information:

πŸ“πŸ“

http://www.ageofautism.com/2015/01/gsks-69-infanrix-deaths-are-not-explicable-as-coincidence.html