Mmm, #SeemsLegit! OMG, I AM LITERALLY CHOKING ON BIG PHARMA BULLSHIT!!! Deadset, I cannot swallow this much utter shit!!

Have you watched “Communicating Vaccine Science and Advancing Vaccine Impact Expert Panel”?


Lori Buher opens up this fantastic meeting with a vaccine panel at the National Meningitis Association (NMA) with the claim:

“You’ll forgive me if I look down at my paperwork more than I look at all of you…”

And I’m hearing:

“…because, even though I’ve sold out to Big Pharma and I’m ever-conscious of my financial affiliates and personal promoters; occasionally my humanity kicks in and I find it difficult to look people in the eye while knowing that I’m speaking a load of harmful bu115h1t. Also, I prefer to read from notes because I don’t really know WTF I’m talking about…”

Take Dorit Reiss [University of California (UC) Hastings Associate Law Professor], for example. There certainly is no question that there is a conflict of interest when it comes to her, her employer and her vaccine advocacy. Dorit Reiss’s employer is not simply a school of law; it is affiliated to major promoters of the vaccine program and has a strategic role in developing health policy.

According to Wiki:

“UCSF is administered separately from Hastings College of Law, another UC institution located in San Francisco. In recent years, UCSF and UC Hastings have increased their collaboration, including the formation of the UCSF/Hastings Consortium on Law, Science, and Health Policy.”

The Consortium “offers impressive opportunities” for students in education, research, and clinical studies, including internships/externships with Kaiser Permanente and others. (8/28/13 press release). (Paper by Consortium members, “Price Transparency in the Health Care Market).

A November 14, 2013 press release announced a new center for the study of uses for the human genome, a joint endeavor of Kaiser Permanente, UC San Francisco and UC Hastings College of Law. To this end, the National Human Genome Research Institute provided $778,000…

…KP’s quality of care has been highly rated and attributed to a strong emphasis on preventive care, its doctors being salaried rather than paid per service, and an attempt to minimize the time patients spend in high-cost hospitals by carefully planning their stay. However, Kaiser has had disputes with its employees’ unions, repeatedly faced civil and criminal charges for falsification of records and patient dumping, faced action by regulators over the quality of care it provided, especially to patients with mental health issues, and has faced criticism from activists and action from regulators over the size of its cash reserves.”


And let us not forget that Raymond J. Baxter, Kaiser Permanente’s senior VP for community benefit, research, and health policy, is also on the board of the CDC Foundation.

When the Katie Couric show questioned the safety of the HPV vaccine:

📍Katie Couric Slammed For Questioning the HPV Vaccine:

In response to this show, Reiss visited a number of sites spewing Pharma narratives. “Vince Brown” on accused Reiss of being “paid to post” in favour of vaccines, to which Reiss replied: “Not really. My law school would pay me the same salary whether or not I post here.”

One of the papers most frequently cited by Reiss in her defence of HPV and the Gardasil vaccine was conducted by Kaiser Permanente on behalf of Merck:

Author Affiliations: Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Oakland (Dr Klein, Messrs Hansen, Emery, and Lewis, and Ms Deosaransingh), Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena (Drs Chao and Jacobsen, Messrs Slezak and Takhar, and Ms Sy), Department of Pediatrics, South Bay Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Los Angeles (Dr Ackerson), and Pharmacy Analytical Service, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Downey (Dr Cheetham); and Department of Epidemiology, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey (Drs Velicer and Liaw)….

Financial Disclosure: This study was funded by Merck & Co. Dr Klein receives research support from Merck & Co, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Novartis, and Sanofipasteur for unrelated studies. Dr Jacobsen and Mr Slezak received research funding from Merck & Co for another study related to HPV4. Mr Slezak served as an unpaid consultant to Merck & Co. Dr Chao received research funding from Merck&Co, Amgen, and Pfizer for unrelated studies. Drs Velicer and Liaw are employees of Merck & Co.

Role of the Sponsor: The study sponsor, Merck & Co, provided substantial input into the study design and analytic plan. In collaboration with the Kaiser Study Team, the sponsor reviewed data analyses and helped draft and revise the manuscript. The Kaiser Study Team investigators made final decisions regarding manuscript edits.


Just a few examples of money exchanging hands between “independent” parties. Again, no conflicts of interest here, am I right?!! 😉





No matter, though… Such self-serving, dirty affiliations is unashamedly justified by Reiss herself:

‘Observers of the administrative state warn against “capture” of administrative agencies and lament its disastrous effects. This article suggests that the term “capture”, applied to a close relationship between industry and regulator, is not useful – by stigmatizing that relationship, judging it as problematic from the start, it hides its potential benefits. The literature on “capture” highlights its negative results – lax enforcement of regulation; weak regulations; illicit benefits going to industry. However, this picture is incomplete and in substantial tension with another current strand of literature which encourages collaboration between industry and regulator. The collaboration literature draws on the fact that industry input into the regulatory process has important benefits for the regulatory state. Industry usually has information no one else has, and has more incentive to give that information to a friendly regulator.

Furthermore, working with industry can substantially improve the impact of regulation; voluntary compliance is cheaper and can be more effective than enforced compliance, and industry can help regulators minimize negative unintended consequences. This paper suggests that instead of engaging in name-calling, we should focus on identifying when a close industry-regulator relationship will work in the public interest, and when it is likely to undermine it. That is an empirical question.’

📍The Benefits of Capture:

I advise people to take a look at some of the TRUE, PEER-REVIEWED papers and articles regarding the HPV vaccine Gardasil and Cervarix:

📍Documents Expose Gardasil / Cervarix / HPV Vaccine:

One of my favourite parts of this video may be seen from approximately 14:00…

“What do people think is the best way to quell parental concerns about vaccinations as doctors…?”

This is when the panel members disclose their most successful implementations and techniques when trying to manipulate parents into believing that vaccines are actually safe and effective and that they – these particular kinds of doctors (the pro-vax kind) – actually care about their patients and not their bonuses.

📍Governments Are Getting Paid To Inject Your Children:

In writing that, I personally don’t believe all pro-vax doctors are bonus-driven when it comes to encouraging the receipt of vaccinations. I believe many are just well-and-truly indoctrinated by the system and the very little vaccine-related information that they learned throughout their manipulated, intentionally-omissive “education”.

My heart truly goes out to Paul Lee (MD, NYU Winthrop Hospital) @ 19:45 when he goes on to say:

“I think the other dilemma is that for some of these paediatricians is like ‘well, the parents is trusting me on one thing but not trusting me on the other. How can you have a relationship when there is 50% trust…?”

If only this was about your sensitive feelings and self-esteem, Dr. Lee!

Unfortunately for you, some parents have common-sense, they love their children and they don’t just want to be told what to with their baby; not without the right to at least ask for elaboration. Also, there is the chance they are aware of VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System):


I’m going to go out on a limb here and add that it may even concern some people that iatrogenic deaths are the third leading cause of death… At least, in the U.S. in 2016 it was…

📍Medical Error – The Third Leading Cause of Death in the U.S.:

“A study by researchers at Johns Hopkins Medicine says medical errors should rank as the third leading cause of death in the United States — and highlights how shortcomings in tracking vital statistics may hinder research and keep the problem out of the public eye.

The authors, led by Johns Hopkins surgeon Dr. Martin Makary, call for changes in death certificates to better tabulate fatal lapses in care. In an open letter, they urge the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to immediately add medical errors to its annual list reporting the top causes of death.


Based on an analysis of prior research, the Johns Hopkins study estimates that more than 250,000 Americans die each year from medical errors. On the CDC’s official list, that would rank just behind heart disease and cancer, which each took about 600,000 lives in 2014, and in front of respiratory disease, which caused about 150,000 deaths.

Medical mistakes that can lead to death range from surgical complications that go unrecognized to mix-ups with the doses or types of medications patients receive.”


📍Doctors Getting Paid to Vaccinate Your Children:

📍Study Suggests Medical Errors Now Third Leading Cause of Death in the U.S.:

📍Medical Error – A Leading Cause Of Death:…/medical-error-a-leading…/index.html

📍Medical Error:

📍Estimating Hospital Deaths Due to Medical Errors:

📍Errors in Health Care: A Leading Cause of Death and Injury:

📍How Many Die from Medical Mistakes in U.S. Hospitals?:

📍A New Evidence-Based Estimate of Patient Harms Associated With Hospital Care:

📍Medical Error Is A Leading Cause Of Death, But You Won’t See It On The CDC’s List:

📍A New, Evidence-based Estimate of Patient Harms Associated with Hospital Care:,_Evidence_based_Estimate_of_Patient_Harms.2.aspx

📍Medical Error Action Group:

📍Medical Mistakes: A Silent Epidemic In Australian Hospitals:

Anyway, I could go on forever about the sheer brilliance of every bu115h1t claim in this video; however, I’ll recommend that you just watch it yourself and LEARN THE MANIPULATIVE TECHNIQUES USED BY MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS WHEN ATTEMPTING TO CONVINCE YOU TO INJECT POISON INTO YOUR BABY!

Just FYI, I am not a multi-trillion dollar industry who is reliant upon your belief to maintain multibillions in annual profitable dollars. I earn nothing. In fact, I pay to be able to maintain my right to speak the truth. Just saying…


📢📢 Shoutout to the following articles and their authors! 📢📢

2 thoughts on “~~ Doctors Discuss Manipulative Techniques To Effectively Sell The Idea of Vaccines To Patients ~~

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s